Canada vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing
Canada
15.6%
in 2022
Sub-Saharan Africa
4.9%
in 2022
Canada rank
6th
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
7th
Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing over time
- Canada
- Sub-Saharan Africa
How they compare
Canada currently reports 15.6% against 4.9% in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 10.7%.
That makes Canada's figure about 3.2 times Sub-Saharan Africa's.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Canada has been ahead every year.
Canada ranks 6th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 7th of 197 countries.
Canada has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Sub-Saharan Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7.8% | 3.0% | 4.8% | Canada |
| 2010s | 10.8% | 2.7% | 8.1% | Canada |
| 2020s | 13.3% | 3.8% | 9.5% | Canada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing, Canada or Sub-Saharan Africa?
- Canada, at 15.6% against 4.9% in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing between Canada and Sub-Saharan Africa?
- 10.7%, with Canada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Sub-Saharan Africa?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2022.
- How do Canada and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing?
- Canada ranks 6th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 7th of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.