Cocos (Keeling) Islands vs United States Virgin Islands: Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing

Cocos (Keeling) Islands
0.0%
in 2022
United States Virgin Islands
0.0%
in 2022
Cocos (Keeling) Islands rank
183rd
United States Virgin Islands rank
185th

Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing over time

  • Cocos (Keeling) Islands
  • United States Virgin Islands
0102030200520132022

How they compare

Cocos (Keeling) Islands currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in United States Virgin Islands, a difference of 0.0%.

That makes Cocos (Keeling) Islands's figure about 1.1 times United States Virgin Islands's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2005 it was United States Virgin Islands ahead.

Cocos (Keeling) Islands ranks 183rd and United States Virgin Islands ranks 185th of 197 countries.

United States Virgin Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cocos (Keeling) Islands United States Virgin Islands Difference Ahead
2000s 3.5% 6.7% 3.2% United States Virgin Islands
2010s 1.6% 3.7% 2.0% United States Virgin Islands
2020s 0.7% 1.9% 1.2% United States Virgin Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing, Cocos (Keeling) Islands or United States Virgin Islands?
Cocos (Keeling) Islands, at 0.0% against 0.0% in United States Virgin Islands as of 2022.
What is the difference in chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing between Cocos (Keeling) Islands and United States Virgin Islands?
0.0%, with Cocos (Keeling) Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cocos (Keeling) Islands and United States Virgin Islands?
18 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2022.
How do Cocos (Keeling) Islands and United States Virgin Islands rank globally for chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing?
Cocos (Keeling) Islands ranks 183rd and United States Virgin Islands ranks 185th of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cocos (Keeling) Islands vs United States Virgin Islands: Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 16 August 2026, from https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/chlorophyll-a-deviations-remote-sensing-percent/cocos-keeling-islands/virgin-islands-u-s/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/chlorophyll-a-deviations-remote-sensing-percent/cocos-keeling-islands/virgin-islands-u-s/">Cocos (Keeling) Islands vs United States Virgin Islands: Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing (%)
Unit
%
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
231 places, 4,092 data points, 2005–2022
Last refreshed