Congo vs Eastern Europe: Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing
Congo
17.8%
in 2022
Eastern Europe
10.2%
in 2022
Congo rank
3rd
Eastern Europe rank
2nd
Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing over time
- Congo
- Eastern Europe
How they compare
Congo currently reports 17.8% against 10.2% in Eastern Europe, a difference of 7.6%.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.7 times Eastern Europe's.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Congo has been ahead every year.
Congo ranks 3rd and Eastern Europe ranks 2nd of 197 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Eastern Europe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 24.7% | 7.5% | 17.3% | Congo |
| 2010s | 16.0% | 7.2% | 8.7% | Congo |
| 2020s | 14.6% | 8.8% | 5.8% | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing, Congo or Eastern Europe?
- Congo, at 17.8% against 10.2% in Eastern Europe as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing between Congo and Eastern Europe?
- 7.6%, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Eastern Europe?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2022.
- How do Congo and Eastern Europe rank globally for chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing?
- Congo ranks 3rd and Eastern Europe ranks 2nd of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.