Congo vs Europe and Northern America: Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing
Congo
17.8%
in 2022
Europe and Northern America
5.5%
in 2022
Congo rank
3rd
Europe and Northern America rank
4th
Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing over time
- Congo
- Europe and Northern America
How they compare
Congo currently reports 17.8% against 5.5% in Europe and Northern America, a difference of 12.3%.
That makes Congo's figure about 3.2 times Europe and Northern America's.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Congo has been ahead every year.
Congo ranks 3rd and Europe and Northern America ranks 4th of 182 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Europe and Northern America | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 24.7% | 6.1% | 18.7% | Congo |
| 2010s | 16.0% | 7.5% | 8.5% | Congo |
| 2020s | 14.6% | 6.9% | 7.7% | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing, Congo or Europe and Northern America?
- Congo, at 17.8% against 5.5% in Europe and Northern America as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing between Congo and Europe and Northern America?
- 12.3%, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Europe and Northern America?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2022.
- How do Congo and Europe and Northern America rank globally for chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing?
- Congo ranks 3rd and Europe and Northern America ranks 4th of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.