Congo vs Northern Europe: Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing
Congo
17.8%
in 2022
Northern Europe
6.1%
in 2022
Congo rank
3rd
Northern Europe rank
3rd
Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing over time
- Congo
- Northern Europe
How they compare
Congo currently reports 17.8% against 6.1% in Northern Europe, a difference of 11.7%.
That makes Congo's figure about 2.9 times Northern Europe's.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Congo has been ahead every year.
Congo ranks 3rd and Northern Europe ranks 3rd of 197 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Northern Europe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 24.7% | 3.8% | 20.9% | Congo |
| 2010s | 16.0% | 4.5% | 11.5% | Congo |
| 2020s | 14.6% | 5.3% | 9.3% | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing, Congo or Northern Europe?
- Congo, at 17.8% against 6.1% in Northern Europe as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing between Congo and Northern Europe?
- 11.7%, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Northern Europe?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2022.
- How do Congo and Northern Europe rank globally for chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing?
- Congo ranks 3rd and Northern Europe ranks 3rd of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.