Congo vs Trinidad and Tobago: Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing
Congo
17.8%
in 2022
Trinidad and Tobago
20.6%
in 2022
Congo rank
3rd
Trinidad and Tobago rank
1st
Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing over time
- Congo
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 20.6% against 17.8% in Congo, a difference of 2.8%.
That makes Trinidad and Tobago's figure about 1.2 times Congo's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 3rd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 24.7% | 10.2% | 14.5% | Congo |
| 2010s | 16.0% | 8.1% | 7.9% | Congo |
| 2020s | 14.6% | 14.2% | 0.4% | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing, Congo or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Trinidad and Tobago, at 20.6% against 17.8% in Congo as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing between Congo and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 2.8%, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2022.
- How do Congo and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing?
- Congo ranks 3rd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 1st of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.