Costa Rica vs Sint Maarten: Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing
Costa Rica
1.3%
in 2022
Sint Maarten
1.2%
in 2022
Costa Rica rank
95th
Sint Maarten rank
98th
Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing over time
- Costa Rica
- Sint Maarten
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 1.3% against 1.2% in Sint Maarten, a difference of 0.1%.
That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.1 times Sint Maarten's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Sint Maarten ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 95th and Sint Maarten ranks 98th of 175 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 1 and Sint Maarten in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Sint Maarten | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.9% | 10.6% | 7.7% | Sint Maarten |
| 2010s | 1.2% | 37.9% | 36.6% | Sint Maarten |
| 2020s | 1.3% | 1.2% | 0.1% | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing, Costa Rica or Sint Maarten?
- Costa Rica, at 1.3% against 1.2% in Sint Maarten as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing between Costa Rica and Sint Maarten?
- 0.1%, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Sint Maarten?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2022.
- How do Costa Rica and Sint Maarten rank globally for chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing?
- Costa Rica ranks 95th and Sint Maarten ranks 98th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.