Cote d'Ivoire vs Guinea-Bissau: Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing
Cote d'Ivoire
2.9%
in 2022
Guinea-Bissau
3.0%
in 2022
Cote d'Ivoire rank
74th
Guinea-Bissau rank
73rd
Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing over time
- Cote d'Ivoire
- Guinea-Bissau
How they compare
Guinea-Bissau currently reports 3.0% against 2.9% in Cote d'Ivoire, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.
Cote d'Ivoire ranks 74th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 73rd of 213 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Cote d'Ivoire averaged higher in 1 and Guinea-Bissau in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cote d'Ivoire | Guinea-Bissau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.9% | 6.3% | 1.4% | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2010s | 3.2% | 6.3% | 3.1% | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2020s | 2.6% | 1.9% | 0.7% | Cote d'Ivoire |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing, Cote d'Ivoire or Guinea-Bissau?
- Guinea-Bissau, at 3.0% against 2.9% in Cote d'Ivoire as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing between Cote d'Ivoire and Guinea-Bissau?
- 0.1%, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cote d'Ivoire and Guinea-Bissau?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2022.
- How do Cote d'Ivoire and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing?
- Cote d'Ivoire ranks 74th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 73rd of 213 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.