Cote d'Ivoire vs South Africa: Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing
Cote d'Ivoire
2.9%
in 2022
South Africa
2.8%
in 2022
Cote d'Ivoire rank
74th
South Africa rank
77th
Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing over time
- Cote d'Ivoire
- South Africa
How they compare
Cote d'Ivoire currently reports 2.9% against 2.8% in South Africa, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Cote d'Ivoire ahead.
Cote d'Ivoire ranks 74th and South Africa ranks 77th of 213 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Cote d'Ivoire averaged higher in 2 and South Africa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cote d'Ivoire | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.9% | 2.6% | 2.3% | Cote d'Ivoire |
| 2010s | 3.2% | 3.0% | 0.2% | Cote d'Ivoire |
| 2020s | 2.6% | 4.8% | 2.2% | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing, Cote d'Ivoire or South Africa?
- Cote d'Ivoire, at 2.9% against 2.8% in South Africa as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing between Cote d'Ivoire and South Africa?
- 0.1%, with Cote d'Ivoire ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cote d'Ivoire and South Africa?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2022.
- How do Cote d'Ivoire and South Africa rank globally for chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing?
- Cote d'Ivoire ranks 74th and South Africa ranks 77th of 213 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.