Cuba vs Saint Helena: Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing
Cuba
0.3%
in 2022
Saint Helena
0.2%
in 2022
Cuba rank
142nd
Saint Helena rank
143rd
Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing over time
- Cuba
- Saint Helena
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 0.3% against 0.2% in Saint Helena, a difference of 0.1%.
That makes Cuba's figure about 1.1 times Saint Helena's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Saint Helena ahead.
Cuba ranks 142nd and Saint Helena ranks 143rd of 197 countries.
Saint Helena has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Saint Helena | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.4% | 2.7% | 1.4% | Saint Helena |
| 2010s | 1.3% | 1.7% | 0.4% | Saint Helena |
| 2020s | 0.4% | 1.7% | 1.2% | Saint Helena |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing, Cuba or Saint Helena?
- Cuba, at 0.3% against 0.2% in Saint Helena as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing between Cuba and Saint Helena?
- 0.1%, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Saint Helena?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2022.
- How do Cuba and Saint Helena rank globally for chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing?
- Cuba ranks 142nd and Saint Helena ranks 143rd of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.