Cuba vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing
Cuba
0.3%
in 2022
Saint Kitts and Nevis
0.2%
in 2022
Cuba rank
142nd
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
145th
Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing over time
- Cuba
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 0.3% against 0.2% in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.1%.
That makes Cuba's figure about 1.2 times Saint Kitts and Nevis's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 142nd and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 145th of 197 countries.
Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.4% | 4.1% | 2.7% | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2010s | 1.3% | 3.2% | 1.9% | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2020s | 0.4% | 0.7% | 0.2% | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing, Cuba or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Cuba, at 0.3% against 0.2% in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing between Cuba and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0.1%, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2022.
- How do Cuba and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing?
- Cuba ranks 142nd and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 145th of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.