Eritrea vs Faroe Islands: Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing
Eritrea
5.4%
in 2022
Faroe Islands
5.8%
in 2022
Eritrea rank
43rd
Faroe Islands rank
41st
Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing over time
- Eritrea
- Faroe Islands
How they compare
Faroe Islands currently reports 5.8% against 5.4% in Eritrea, a difference of 0.4%.
That makes Faroe Islands's figure about 1.1 times Eritrea's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Faroe Islands ahead.
Eritrea ranks 43rd and Faroe Islands ranks 41st of 197 countries.
Faroe Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Faroe Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.0% | 5.1% | 1.1% | Faroe Islands |
| 2010s | 2.8% | 6.0% | 3.2% | Faroe Islands |
| 2020s | 3.6% | 5.2% | 1.5% | Faroe Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing, Eritrea or Faroe Islands?
- Faroe Islands, at 5.8% against 5.4% in Eritrea as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing between Eritrea and Faroe Islands?
- 0.4%, with Faroe Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Faroe Islands?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2022.
- How do Eritrea and Faroe Islands rank globally for chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing?
- Eritrea ranks 43rd and Faroe Islands ranks 41st of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.