Finland vs Guinea-Bissau: Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing
Finland
2.7%
in 2022
Guinea-Bissau
3.0%
in 2022
Finland rank
69th
Guinea-Bissau rank
66th
Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing over time
- Finland
- Guinea-Bissau
How they compare
Guinea-Bissau currently reports 3.0% against 2.7% in Finland, a difference of 0.3%.
That makes Guinea-Bissau's figure about 1.1 times Finland's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.
Finland ranks 69th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 66th of 197 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 1 and Guinea-Bissau in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Guinea-Bissau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.2% | 6.3% | 5.1% | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2010s | 3.2% | 6.3% | 3.1% | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2020s | 4.4% | 1.9% | 2.5% | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing, Finland or Guinea-Bissau?
- Guinea-Bissau, at 3.0% against 2.7% in Finland as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing between Finland and Guinea-Bissau?
- 0.3%, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Guinea-Bissau?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2022.
- How do Finland and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing?
- Finland ranks 69th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 66th of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.