French Southern Territories vs Iceland: Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing
French Southern Territories
10.1%
in 2021
Iceland
10.2%
in 2022
French Southern Territories rank
19th
Iceland rank
18th
Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing over time
- French Southern Territories
- Iceland
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 10.2% against 10.1% in French Southern Territories, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Iceland ahead.
French Southern Territories ranks 19th and Iceland ranks 18th of 175 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | French Southern Territories | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.3% | 8.5% | 5.2% | Iceland |
| 2010s | 3.9% | 12.0% | 8.2% | Iceland |
| 2020s | 7.5% | 9.6% | 2.1% | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing, French Southern Territories or Iceland?
- Iceland, at 10.2% against 10.1% in French Southern Territories as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing between French Southern Territories and Iceland?
- 0.1%, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for French Southern Territories and Iceland?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2021.
- How do French Southern Territories and Iceland rank globally for chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing?
- French Southern Territories ranks 19th and Iceland ranks 18th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.