French Southern Territories vs Naoero: Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing
French Southern Territories
10.1%
in 2021
Naoero
11.0%
in 2022
French Southern Territories rank
22nd
Naoero rank
19th
Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing over time
- French Southern Territories
- Naoero
How they compare
Naoero currently reports 11.0% against 10.1% in French Southern Territories, a difference of 0.9%.
That makes Naoero's figure about 1.1 times French Southern Territories's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Naoero ahead.
French Southern Territories ranks 22nd and Naoero ranks 19th of 213 countries.
Naoero has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | French Southern Territories | Naoero | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.3% | 14.2% | 10.9% | Naoero |
| 2010s | 3.8% | 13.6% | 9.8% | Naoero |
| 2020s | 7.5% | 44.6% | 37.1% | Naoero |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing, French Southern Territories or Naoero?
- Naoero, at 11.0% against 10.1% in French Southern Territories as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing between French Southern Territories and Naoero?
- 0.9%, with Naoero ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for French Southern Territories and Naoero?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2021.
- How do French Southern Territories and Naoero rank globally for chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing?
- French Southern Territories ranks 22nd and Naoero ranks 19th of 213 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.