Iceland vs Nauru: Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing
Iceland
10.2%
in 2022
Nauru
11.0%
in 2022
Iceland rank
19th
Nauru rank
18th
Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing over time
- Iceland
- Nauru
How they compare
Nauru currently reports 11.0% against 10.2% in Iceland, a difference of 0.8%.
That makes Nauru's figure about 1.1 times Iceland's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Iceland ahead.
Iceland ranks 19th and Nauru ranks 18th of 197 countries.
Nauru has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Nauru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8.5% | 14.2% | 5.7% | Nauru |
| 2010s | 11.9% | 13.6% | 1.6% | Nauru |
| 2020s | 9.8% | 33.4% | 23.6% | Nauru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing, Iceland or Nauru?
- Nauru, at 11.0% against 10.2% in Iceland as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing between Iceland and Nauru?
- 0.8%, with Nauru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Nauru?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2022.
- How do Iceland and Nauru rank globally for chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing?
- Iceland ranks 19th and Nauru ranks 18th of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.