Iceland vs Norway: Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing
Iceland
10.2%
in 2022
Norway
11.1%
in 2022
Iceland rank
19th
Norway rank
16th
Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing over time
- Iceland
- Norway
How they compare
Norway currently reports 11.1% against 10.2% in Iceland, a difference of 0.9%.
That makes Norway's figure about 1.1 times Iceland's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Iceland ahead.
Iceland ranks 19th and Norway ranks 16th of 197 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 2 and Norway in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8.5% | 7.0% | 1.6% | Iceland |
| 2010s | 12.0% | 10.7% | 1.4% | Iceland |
| 2020s | 9.8% | 11.6% | 1.8% | Norway |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing, Iceland or Norway?
- Norway, at 11.1% against 10.2% in Iceland as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing between Iceland and Norway?
- 0.9%, with Norway ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Norway?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2022.
- How do Iceland and Norway rank globally for chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing?
- Iceland ranks 19th and Norway ranks 16th of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.