Iceland vs Southern Africa: Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing
Iceland
10.2%
in 2022
Southern Africa
2.9%
in 2022
Iceland rank
19th
Southern Africa rank
20th
Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing over time
- Iceland
- Southern Africa
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 10.2% against 2.9% in Southern Africa, a difference of 7.3%.
That makes Iceland's figure about 3.6 times Southern Africa's.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.
Iceland ranks 19th and Southern Africa ranks 20th of 197 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Southern Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8.5% | 2.8% | 5.8% | Iceland |
| 2010s | 12.0% | 3.2% | 8.9% | Iceland |
| 2020s | 9.8% | 4.7% | 5.1% | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing, Iceland or Southern Africa?
- Iceland, at 10.2% against 2.9% in Southern Africa as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing between Iceland and Southern Africa?
- 7.3%, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Southern Africa?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2022.
- How do Iceland and Southern Africa rank globally for chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing?
- Iceland ranks 19th and Southern Africa ranks 20th of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.