Iceland vs United Republic of Tanzania: Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing
Iceland
10.2%
in 2022
United Republic of Tanzania
0.2%
in 2022
Iceland rank
18th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
15th
Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing over time
- Iceland
- United Republic of Tanzania
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 10.2% against 0.2% in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 10.0%.
That makes Iceland's figure about 43.8 times United Republic of Tanzania's.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.
Iceland ranks 18th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 15th of 182 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | United Republic of Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8.5% | 0.5% | 8.0% | Iceland |
| 2010s | 12.0% | 0.4% | 11.7% | Iceland |
| 2020s | 9.8% | 0.3% | 9.5% | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing, Iceland or United Republic of Tanzania?
- Iceland, at 10.2% against 0.2% in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing between Iceland and United Republic of Tanzania?
- 10.0%, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and United Republic of Tanzania?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2022.
- How do Iceland and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing?
- Iceland ranks 18th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 15th of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.