Kiribati vs Samoa: Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing
Kiribati
0.1%
in 2022
Samoa
0.1%
in 2022
Kiribati rank
169th
Samoa rank
172nd
Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing over time
- Kiribati
- Samoa
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 0.1% against 0.1% in Samoa, a difference of 0.0%.
That makes Kiribati's figure about 1.5 times Samoa's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Samoa ahead.
Kiribati ranks 169th and Samoa ranks 172nd of 197 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 1 and Samoa in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.9% | 2.0% | 0.1% | Samoa |
| 2010s | 1.4% | 0.7% | 0.7% | Kiribati |
| 2020s | 2.3% | 4.8% | 2.5% | Samoa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing, Kiribati or Samoa?
- Kiribati, at 0.1% against 0.1% in Samoa as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing between Kiribati and Samoa?
- 0.0%, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Samoa?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2022.
- How do Kiribati and Samoa rank globally for chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing?
- Kiribati ranks 169th and Samoa ranks 172nd of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.