Latin America and the Caribbean vs Nauru: Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing
Latin America and the Caribbean
3.0%
in 2022
Nauru
11.0%
in 2022
Latin America and the Caribbean rank
17th
Nauru rank
17th
Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing over time
- Latin America and the Caribbean
- Nauru
How they compare
Nauru currently reports 11.0% against 3.0% in Latin America and the Caribbean, a difference of 8.0%.
That makes Nauru's figure about 3.7 times Latin America and the Caribbean's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Latin America and the Caribbean ahead.
Latin America and the Caribbean ranks 17th and Nauru ranks 17th of 30 groups.
Nauru has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latin America and the Caribbean | Nauru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.3% | 14.2% | 9.9% | Nauru |
| 2010s | 4.7% | 13.6% | 8.9% | Nauru |
| 2020s | 4.8% | 33.4% | 28.6% | Nauru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing, Latin America and the Caribbean or Nauru?
- Nauru, at 11.0% against 3.0% in Latin America and the Caribbean as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing between Latin America and the Caribbean and Nauru?
- 8.0%, with Nauru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latin America and the Caribbean and Nauru?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2022.
- How do Latin America and the Caribbean and Nauru rank globally for chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing?
- Latin America and the Caribbean ranks 17th and Nauru ranks 17th of 30 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.