Middle Africa vs Trinidad and Tobago: Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing
Middle Africa
11.7%
in 2022
Trinidad and Tobago
20.6%
in 2022
Middle Africa rank
2nd
Trinidad and Tobago rank
1st
Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing over time
- Middle Africa
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 20.6% against 11.7% in Middle Africa, a difference of 8.9%.
That makes Trinidad and Tobago's figure about 1.8 times Middle Africa's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Middle Africa ahead.
Middle Africa ranks 2nd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 1st of 19 regions.
Across the 3 decades both report, Middle Africa averaged higher in 2 and Trinidad and Tobago in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Middle Africa | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 17.5% | 10.2% | 7.3% | Middle Africa |
| 2010s | 11.9% | 8.1% | 3.8% | Middle Africa |
| 2020s | 10.0% | 14.2% | 4.1% | Trinidad and Tobago |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing, Middle Africa or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Trinidad and Tobago, at 20.6% against 11.7% in Middle Africa as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing between Middle Africa and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 8.9%, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Middle Africa and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2022.
- How do Middle Africa and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing?
- Middle Africa ranks 2nd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 1st of 19 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.