Nauru vs Naoero: Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing
Nauru
11.0%
in 2022
Naoero
11.0%
in 2022
Nauru rank
19th
Naoero rank
19th
Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing over time
- Nauru
- Naoero
How they compare
Nauru currently reports 11.0% against 11.0% in Naoero, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Naoero has been ahead every year.
Nauru ranks 19th and Naoero ranks 19th of 213 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nauru | Naoero | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 14.2% | 14.2% | 0.0% | — |
| 2010s | 13.6% | 13.6% | 0.0% | — |
| 2020s | 33.4% | 33.4% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing, Nauru or Naoero?
- Nauru, at 11.0% against 11.0% in Naoero as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing between Nauru and Naoero?
- 0.0%, with Nauru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nauru and Naoero?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2022.
- How do Nauru and Naoero rank globally for chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing?
- Nauru ranks 19th and Naoero ranks 19th of 213 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.