Nauru vs Norway: Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing
Nauru
11.0%
in 2022
Norway
11.1%
in 2022
Nauru rank
18th
Norway rank
16th
Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing over time
- Nauru
- Norway
How they compare
Norway currently reports 11.1% against 11.0% in Nauru, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Norway ahead.
Nauru ranks 18th and Norway ranks 16th of 197 countries.
Nauru has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nauru | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 14.2% | 7.0% | 7.2% | Nauru |
| 2010s | 13.6% | 10.5% | 3.1% | Nauru |
| 2020s | 33.4% | 11.6% | 21.8% | Nauru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing, Nauru or Norway?
- Norway, at 11.1% against 11.0% in Nauru as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing between Nauru and Norway?
- 0.1%, with Norway ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nauru and Norway?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2022.
- How do Nauru and Norway rank globally for chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing?
- Nauru ranks 18th and Norway ranks 16th of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.