Nauru vs Oceania: Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing
Nauru
11.0%
in 2022
Oceania
3.4%
in 2022
Nauru rank
18th
Oceania rank
15th
Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing over time
- Nauru
- Oceania
How they compare
Nauru currently reports 11.0% against 3.4% in Oceania, a difference of 7.6%.
That makes Nauru's figure about 3.2 times Oceania's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Nauru ahead.
Nauru ranks 18th and Oceania ranks 15th of 197 countries.
Nauru has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nauru | Oceania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 14.2% | 3.2% | 11.0% | Nauru |
| 2010s | 13.6% | 2.8% | 10.7% | Nauru |
| 2020s | 33.4% | 4.6% | 28.8% | Nauru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing, Nauru or Oceania?
- Nauru, at 11.0% against 3.4% in Oceania as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing between Nauru and Oceania?
- 7.6%, with Nauru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nauru and Oceania?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2022.
- How do Nauru and Oceania rank globally for chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing?
- Nauru ranks 18th and Oceania ranks 15th of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.