New Caledonia vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing
New Caledonia
0.2%
in 2022
Turks and Caicos Islands
0.2%
in 2022
New Caledonia rank
135th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
136th
Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing over time
- New Caledonia
- Turks and Caicos Islands
How they compare
New Caledonia currently reports 0.2% against 0.2% in Turks and Caicos Islands, a difference of 0.0%.
That makes New Caledonia's figure about 1.1 times Turks and Caicos Islands's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2005 it was New Caledonia ahead.
New Caledonia ranks 135th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 136th of 182 countries.
New Caledonia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Caledonia | Turks and Caicos Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.0% | 0.7% | 0.4% | New Caledonia |
| 2010s | 1.7% | 0.4% | 1.3% | New Caledonia |
| 2020s | 0.8% | 0.4% | 0.4% | New Caledonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing, New Caledonia or Turks and Caicos Islands?
- New Caledonia, at 0.2% against 0.2% in Turks and Caicos Islands as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing between New Caledonia and Turks and Caicos Islands?
- 0.0%, with New Caledonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Turks and Caicos Islands?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2022.
- How do New Caledonia and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing?
- New Caledonia ranks 135th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 136th of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.