New Zealand vs Uruguay: Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing
New Zealand
6.9%
in 2022
Uruguay
7.3%
in 2022
New Zealand rank
37th
Uruguay rank
34th
Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing over time
- New Zealand
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 7.3% against 6.9% in New Zealand, a difference of 0.4%.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.1 times New Zealand's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2005 it was New Zealand ahead.
New Zealand ranks 37th and Uruguay ranks 34th of 197 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, New Zealand averaged higher in 2 and Uruguay in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.5% | 4.0% | 0.4% | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 4.7% | 11.3% | 6.6% | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 9.1% | 6.3% | 2.9% | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing, New Zealand or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 7.3% against 6.9% in New Zealand as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing between New Zealand and Uruguay?
- 0.4%, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Uruguay?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2022.
- How do New Zealand and Uruguay rank globally for chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing?
- New Zealand ranks 37th and Uruguay ranks 34th of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.