Nicaragua vs Saint Barthélemy: Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing
Nicaragua
2.2%
in 2022
Saint Barthélemy
2.2%
in 2022
Nicaragua rank
78th
Saint Barthélemy rank
81st
Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing over time
- Nicaragua
- Saint Barthélemy
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 2.2% against 2.2% in Saint Barthélemy, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Nicaragua ahead.
Nicaragua ranks 78th and Saint Barthélemy ranks 81st of 197 countries.
Saint Barthélemy has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nicaragua | Saint Barthélemy | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.8% | 15.9% | 13.1% | Saint Barthélemy |
| 2010s | 2.8% | 2.9% | 0.1% | Saint Barthélemy |
| 2020s | 2.0% | 3.0% | 1.0% | Saint Barthélemy |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing, Nicaragua or Saint Barthélemy?
- Nicaragua, at 2.2% against 2.2% in Saint Barthélemy as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing between Nicaragua and Saint Barthélemy?
- 0.0%, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Saint Barthélemy?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2022.
- How do Nicaragua and Saint Barthélemy rank globally for chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing?
- Nicaragua ranks 78th and Saint Barthélemy ranks 81st of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.