Northern Africa vs Romania: Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing
Northern Africa
0.5%
in 2022
Romania
7.9%
in 2022
Northern Africa rank
32nd
Romania rank
31st
Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing over time
- Northern Africa
- Romania
How they compare
Romania currently reports 7.9% against 0.5% in Northern Africa, a difference of 7.4%.
That makes Romania's figure about 16.6 times Northern Africa's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Romania ahead.
Northern Africa ranks 32nd and Romania ranks 31st of 34 groups.
Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Northern Africa | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.2% | 8.7% | 6.4% | Romania |
| 2010s | 2.2% | 3.1% | 0.9% | Romania |
| 2020s | 1.3% | 3.7% | 2.4% | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing, Northern Africa or Romania?
- Romania, at 7.9% against 0.5% in Northern Africa as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing between Northern Africa and Romania?
- 7.4%, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Northern Africa and Romania?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2022.
- How do Northern Africa and Romania rank globally for chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing?
- Northern Africa ranks 32nd and Romania ranks 31st of 34 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.