Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) vs Peru: Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing

Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)
2.0%
in 2022
Peru
8.8%
in 2022
Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) rank
23rd
Peru rank
23rd

Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing over time

  • Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)
  • Peru
02.557.51012.5200520132022

How they compare

Peru currently reports 8.8% against 2.0% in Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand), a difference of 6.8%.

That makes Peru's figure about 4.5 times Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)'s.

Across all 18 years both countries report, Peru has been ahead every year.

Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) ranks 23rd and Peru ranks 23rd of 30 groups.

Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) Peru Difference Ahead
2000s 2.0% 6.5% 4.5% Peru
2010s 1.7% 7.7% 6.0% Peru
2020s 2.3% 8.8% 6.5% Peru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing, Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) or Peru?
Peru, at 8.8% against 2.0% in Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) as of 2022.
What is the difference in chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing between Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) and Peru?
6.8%, with Peru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) and Peru?
18 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2022.
How do Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) and Peru rank globally for chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing?
Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) ranks 23rd and Peru ranks 23rd of 30 groups.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) vs Peru: Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/chlorophyll-a-deviations-remote-sensing-percent/oceania-exc-australia-and-new-zealand/peru/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/chlorophyll-a-deviations-remote-sensing-percent/oceania-exc-australia-and-new-zealand/peru/">Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) vs Peru: Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing (%)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
231 places, 4,092 data points, 2005–2022
Last refreshed