Polynesia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing
Polynesia
0.2%
in 2022
United Republic of Tanzania
0.2%
in 2022
Polynesia rank
14th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
15th
Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing over time
- Polynesia
- United Republic of Tanzania
How they compare
Polynesia currently reports 0.2% against 0.2% in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Polynesia has been ahead every year.
Polynesia ranks 14th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 15th of 19 regions.
Polynesia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Polynesia | United Republic of Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.6% | 0.5% | 1.0% | Polynesia |
| 2010s | 1.2% | 0.4% | 0.9% | Polynesia |
| 2020s | 2.1% | 0.3% | 1.8% | Polynesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing, Polynesia or United Republic of Tanzania?
- Polynesia, at 0.2% against 0.2% in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing between Polynesia and United Republic of Tanzania?
- 0.0%, with Polynesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Polynesia and United Republic of Tanzania?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2022.
- How do Polynesia and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing?
- Polynesia ranks 14th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 15th of 19 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.