Sao Tome and Principe vs Saudi Arabia: Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing

Sao Tome and Principe
1.2%
in 2022
Saudi Arabia
1.3%
in 2022
Sao Tome and Principe rank
99th
Saudi Arabia rank
96th

Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing over time

  • Sao Tome and Principe
  • Saudi Arabia
012345200520132022

How they compare

Saudi Arabia currently reports 1.3% against 1.2% in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.1%.

That makes Saudi Arabia's figure about 1.1 times Sao Tome and Principe's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Sao Tome and Principe ranks 99th and Saudi Arabia ranks 96th of 182 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Sao Tome and Principe averaged higher in 2 and Saudi Arabia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Difference Ahead
2000s 2.5% 1.6% 0.9% Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 1.7% 1.6% 0.1% Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 1.1% 1.2% 0.1% Saudi Arabia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing, Sao Tome and Principe or Saudi Arabia?
Saudi Arabia, at 1.3% against 1.2% in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2022.
What is the difference in chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing between Sao Tome and Principe and Saudi Arabia?
0.1%, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sao Tome and Principe and Saudi Arabia?
18 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2022.
How do Sao Tome and Principe and Saudi Arabia rank globally for chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing?
Sao Tome and Principe ranks 99th and Saudi Arabia ranks 96th of 182 countries.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sao Tome and Principe vs Saudi Arabia: Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/chlorophyll-a-deviations-remote-sensing-percent/sao-tome-and-principe/saudi-arabia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/chlorophyll-a-deviations-remote-sensing-percent/sao-tome-and-principe/saudi-arabia/">Sao Tome and Principe vs Saudi Arabia: Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing (%)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
231 places, 4,092 data points, 2005–2022
Last refreshed