Sao Tome and Principe vs Sint Maarten: Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing

Sao Tome and Principe
1.2%
in 2022
Sint Maarten
1.2%
in 2022
Sao Tome and Principe rank
99th
Sint Maarten rank
98th

Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing over time

  • Sao Tome and Principe
  • Sint Maarten
020406080100200520132022

How they compare

Sint Maarten currently reports 1.2% against 1.2% in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.0%.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Sao Tome and Principe ranks 99th and Sint Maarten ranks 98th of 182 countries.

Sint Maarten has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sao Tome and Principe Sint Maarten Difference Ahead
2000s 2.8% 10.6% 7.9% Sint Maarten
2010s 1.6% 37.9% 36.3% Sint Maarten
2020s 1.2% 1.2% 0.0% Sint Maarten

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing, Sao Tome and Principe or Sint Maarten?
Sint Maarten, at 1.2% against 1.2% in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2022.
What is the difference in chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing between Sao Tome and Principe and Sint Maarten?
0.0%, with Sint Maarten ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sao Tome and Principe and Sint Maarten?
8 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2022.
How do Sao Tome and Principe and Sint Maarten rank globally for chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing?
Sao Tome and Principe ranks 99th and Sint Maarten ranks 98th of 182 countries.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sao Tome and Principe vs Sint Maarten: Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/chlorophyll-a-deviations-remote-sensing-percent/sao-tome-and-principe/sint-maarten-dutch-part/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/chlorophyll-a-deviations-remote-sensing-percent/sao-tome-and-principe/sint-maarten-dutch-part/">Sao Tome and Principe vs Sint Maarten: Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing (%)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
231 places, 4,092 data points, 2005–2022
Last refreshed