Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing

Saint Kitts and Nevis
0.2%
in 2022
Turks and Caicos Islands
0.2%
in 2022
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
134th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
136th

Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing over time

  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
0510152025200520132022

How they compare

Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 0.2% against 0.2% in Turks and Caicos Islands, a difference of 0.0%.

That makes Saint Kitts and Nevis's figure about 1.1 times Turks and Caicos Islands's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.

Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 134th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 136th of 182 countries.

Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Saint Kitts and Nevis Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
2000s 4.1% 0.7% 3.4% Saint Kitts and Nevis
2010s 3.2% 0.4% 2.8% Saint Kitts and Nevis
2020s 0.7% 0.4% 0.3% Saint Kitts and Nevis

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing, Saint Kitts and Nevis or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 0.2% against 0.2% in Turks and Caicos Islands as of 2022.
What is the difference in chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing between Saint Kitts and Nevis and Turks and Caicos Islands?
0.0%, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Kitts and Nevis and Turks and Caicos Islands?
18 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2022.
How do Saint Kitts and Nevis and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing?
Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 134th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 136th of 182 countries.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/chlorophyll-a-deviations-remote-sensing-percent/st-kitts-and-nevis/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/chlorophyll-a-deviations-remote-sensing-percent/st-kitts-and-nevis/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing (%)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
231 places, 4,092 data points, 2005–2022
Last refreshed