Turks and Caicos Islands vs United Republic of Tanzania: Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing

Turks and Caicos Islands
0.2%
in 2022
United Republic of Tanzania
0.2%
in 2022
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
157th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
155th

Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing over time

  • Turks and Caicos Islands
  • United Republic of Tanzania
00.511.5200520132022

How they compare

United Republic of Tanzania currently reports 0.2% against 0.2% in Turks and Caicos Islands, a difference of 0.0%.

That makes United Republic of Tanzania's figure about 1.1 times Turks and Caicos Islands's.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.

Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 157th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 155th of 211 countries.

Turks and Caicos Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Turks and Caicos Islands United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
2000s 0.7% 0.5% 0.1% Turks and Caicos Islands
2010s 0.4% 0.4% 0.0% Turks and Caicos Islands
2020s 0.4% 0.3% 0.1% Turks and Caicos Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing, Turks and Caicos Islands or United Republic of Tanzania?
United Republic of Tanzania, at 0.2% against 0.2% in Turks and Caicos Islands as of 2022.
What is the difference in chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing between Turks and Caicos Islands and United Republic of Tanzania?
0.0%, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Turks and Caicos Islands and United Republic of Tanzania?
18 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2022.
How do Turks and Caicos Islands and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing?
Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 157th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 155th of 211 countries.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Turks and Caicos Islands vs United Republic of Tanzania: Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/chlorophyll-a-deviations-remote-sensing-percent/turks-and-caicos-islands/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/chlorophyll-a-deviations-remote-sensing-percent/turks-and-caicos-islands/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Turks and Caicos Islands vs United Republic of Tanzania: Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing (%)
Unit
%
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
243 places, 4,308 data points, 2005–2022
Last refreshed