Large Marine Ecosystem: Barents Sea vs Large Marine Ecosystem: Gulf of California: Coastal eutrophication: Total Phosphorus (TP) (kilograms of)

Large Marine Ecosystem: Barents Sea
197.61
in 2015
Large Marine Ecosystem: Gulf of California
193.09
in 2015
Large Marine Ecosystem: Barents Sea rank
48th
Large Marine Ecosystem: Gulf of California rank
50th

Coastal eutrophication: Total Phosphorus (TP) (kilograms of) over time

  • Large Marine Ecosystem: Barents Sea
  • Large Marine Ecosystem: Gulf of California
50100150200250200020072015

How they compare

Large Marine Ecosystem: Barents Sea currently reports 197.61 against 193.09 in Large Marine Ecosystem: Gulf of California, a difference of 4.52.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Large Marine Ecosystem: Barents Sea ahead.

Large Marine Ecosystem: Barents Sea ranks 48th and Large Marine Ecosystem: Gulf of California ranks 50th of 64 countries.

Large Marine Ecosystem: Barents Sea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Large Marine Ecosystem: Barents Sea Large Marine Ecosystem: Gulf of California Difference Ahead
2000s 200.07 122.03 78.04 Large Marine Ecosystem: Barents Sea
2010s 163.94 144.79 19.14 Large Marine Ecosystem: Barents Sea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher coastal eutrophication: total phosphorus (tp) (kilograms of), Large Marine Ecosystem: Barents Sea or Large Marine Ecosystem: Gulf of California?
Large Marine Ecosystem: Barents Sea, at 197.61 against 193.09 in Large Marine Ecosystem: Gulf of California as of 2015.
What is the difference in coastal eutrophication: total phosphorus (tp) (kilograms of) between Large Marine Ecosystem: Barents Sea and Large Marine Ecosystem: Gulf of California?
4.52, with Large Marine Ecosystem: Barents Sea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Large Marine Ecosystem: Barents Sea and Large Marine Ecosystem: Gulf of California?
16 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2015.
How do Large Marine Ecosystem: Barents Sea and Large Marine Ecosystem: Gulf of California rank globally for coastal eutrophication: total phosphorus (tp) (kilograms of)?
Large Marine Ecosystem: Barents Sea ranks 48th and Large Marine Ecosystem: Gulf of California ranks 50th of 64 countries.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Coastal eutrophication: Total Phosphorus (TP) (kilograms of phosphorus from algae biomass per sq. km. of river basin area per day). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Large Marine Ecosystem: Barents Sea vs Large Marine Ecosystem: Gulf of California: Coastal eutrophication: Total Phosphorus (TP) (kilograms of). Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/coastal-eutrophication-total-phosphorus-tp-kilograms-of-phosphorus-from-algae-biomass-per/large-marine-ecosystem-barents-sea/large-marine-ecosystem-gulf-of-california/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/coastal-eutrophication-total-phosphorus-tp-kilograms-of-phosphorus-from-algae-biomass-per/large-marine-ecosystem-barents-sea/large-marine-ecosystem-gulf-of-california/">Large Marine Ecosystem: Barents Sea vs Large Marine Ecosystem: Gulf of California: Coastal eutrophication: Total Phosphorus (TP) (kilograms of)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Coastal eutrophication: Total Phosphorus (TP) (kilograms of phosphorus from algae biomass per sq. km. of river basin area per day)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
66 places, 1,056 data points, 2000–2015
Last refreshed