Australia and New Zealand vs Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs): Countries with national statistical legislation exists that complies

Australia and New Zealand
1
in 2025
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
26
in 2025
Australia and New Zealand rank
4th
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) rank
7th

Countries with national statistical legislation exists that complies over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
0510152025201920222025

How they compare

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) currently reports 26 against 1 in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 25.

That makes Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 26.0 times Australia and New Zealand's.

Across all 7 years both countries report, Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) has been ahead every year.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 4th and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ranks 7th of 189 countries.

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) Difference Ahead
2010s 2 16 14 Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
2020s 1.67 23.17 21.5 Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher countries with national statistical legislation exists that complies, Australia and New Zealand or Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)?
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs), at 26 against 1 in Australia and New Zealand as of 2025.
What is the difference in countries with national statistical legislation exists that complies between Australia and New Zealand and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)?
25, with Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)?
7 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2025.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) rank globally for countries with national statistical legislation exists that complies?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 4th and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ranks 7th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Countries with national statistical legislation exists that complies with the Fundamental Principles of Official Statistics (1 = YES; 0 = NO). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs): Countries with national statistical legislation exists that complies. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/countries-with-national-statistical-legislation-exists-that-complies-with-the-fundamental/australia-and-new-zealand/landlocked-developing-countries-lldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/countries-with-national-statistical-legislation-exists-that-complies-with-the-fundamental/australia-and-new-zealand/landlocked-developing-countries-lldcs/">Australia and New Zealand vs Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs): Countries with national statistical legislation exists that complies</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Countries with national statistical legislation exists that complies with the Fundamental Principles of Official Statistics (1 = YES; 0 = NO)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
224 places, 1,515 data points, 2019–2025
Last refreshed