Martinique vs Puerto Rico: Domestic material consumption per capita, by type of raw material
Martinique
2.48 tonnes
in 2022
Puerto Rico
2.28 tonnes
in 2022
Martinique rank
209th
Puerto Rico rank
211th
Domestic material consumption per capita, by type of raw material over time
- Martinique
- Puerto Rico
How they compare
Martinique currently reports 2.48 tonnes against 2.28 tonnes in Puerto Rico, a difference of 0.2 tonnes.
That makes Martinique's figure about 1.1 times Puerto Rico's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Martinique ahead.
Martinique ranks 209th and Puerto Rico ranks 211th of 247 countries.
Martinique has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Martinique | Puerto Rico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 12.48 tonnes | 2.87 tonnes | 9.62 tonnes | Martinique |
| 2010s | 4.18 tonnes | 2.1 tonnes | 2.08 tonnes | Martinique |
| 2020s | 2.43 tonnes | 2.23 tonnes | 0.1956 tonnes | Martinique |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher domestic material consumption per capita, by type of raw material, Martinique or Puerto Rico?
- Martinique, at 2.48 tonnes against 2.28 tonnes in Puerto Rico as of 2022.
- What is the difference in domestic material consumption per capita, by type of raw material between Martinique and Puerto Rico?
- 0.2 tonnes, with Martinique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Martinique and Puerto Rico?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Martinique and Puerto Rico rank globally for domestic material consumption per capita, by type of raw material?
- Martinique ranks 209th and Puerto Rico ranks 211th of 247 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Domestic material consumption per capita, by type of raw material (tonnes). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.