Norway vs Poland: Goods (excluding arms) admitted free of tariffs from developing countr
Goods (excluding arms) admitted free of tariffs from developing countr over time
- Norway
- Poland
How they compare
Norway currently reports 95.2% against 83.7% in Poland, a difference of 11.5%.
That makes Norway's figure about 1.1 times Poland's.
Across all 19 years both countries report, Norway has been ahead every year.
Norway ranks 2nd and Poland ranks 4th of 33 countries.
Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Norway | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 64.2% | 51.4% | 12.8% | Norway |
| 2000s | 89.2% | 74.8% | 14.4% | Norway |
| 2010s | 95.0% | 83.7% | 11.2% | Norway |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher goods (excluding arms) admitted free of tariffs from developing countr, Norway or Poland?
- Norway, at 95.2% against 83.7% in Poland as of 2014.
- What is the difference in goods (excluding arms) admitted free of tariffs from developing countr between Norway and Poland?
- 11.5%, with Norway ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and Poland?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2014.
- How do Norway and Poland rank globally for goods (excluding arms) admitted free of tariffs from developing countr?
- Norway ranks 2nd and Poland ranks 4th of 33 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, World Trade Organization, and International Trade Center. Data are available online at: www.mdg-trade.org, published as Goods (excluding arms) admitted free of tariffs from developing countries (% total merchandise imports excluding arms). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
It is the proportion of duty free imports (excluding arms) into developed countries from developing and least developed countries. For the purpose of calculating this indicator, Japan in Asia, Canada and the United States in North America, Australia and New Zealand in Oceania and Iceland, Norway, Switzerland and the EU (25 countries included since 2004) in Europe are considered “developed” regions or areas, following the common accepted practice used for MDG indicators. Developing countries are those not listed as developed or transition countries. The list of least developed countries (LDCs) has been agreed by the General Assembly, on the recommendation of the Committee for Development Policy, Economic and Social Council.