Australia vs Lithuania: Goods (excluding arms) admitted free of tariffs from least developed
Goods (excluding arms) admitted free of tariffs from least developed over time
- Australia
- Lithuania
How they compare
Australia currently reports 100.0% against 99.0% in Lithuania, a difference of 1.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 19 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 3rd and Lithuania ranks 6th of 33 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 2 and Lithuania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 96.6% | 96.6% | 0.0% | Lithuania |
| 2000s | 98.7% | 97.8% | 0.8% | Australia |
| 2010s | 100.0% | 99.4% | 0.6% | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher goods (excluding arms) admitted free of tariffs from least developed, Australia or Lithuania?
- Australia, at 100.0% against 99.0% in Lithuania as of 2014.
- What is the difference in goods (excluding arms) admitted free of tariffs from least developed between Australia and Lithuania?
- 1.0%, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Lithuania?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2014.
- How do Australia and Lithuania rank globally for goods (excluding arms) admitted free of tariffs from least developed?
- Australia ranks 3rd and Lithuania ranks 6th of 33 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, World Trade Organization, and International Trade Center. Data are available online at: www.mdg-trade.org, published as Goods (excluding arms) admitted free of tariffs from least developed countries (% total merchandise imports excluding arms). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
It is the proportion of duty free imports (excluding arms) into developed countries from developing and least developed countries. For the purpose of calculating this indicator, Japan in Asia, Canada and the United States in North America, Australia and New Zealand in Oceania and Iceland, Norway, Switzerland and the EU (25 countries included since 2004) in Europe are considered “developed” regions or areas, following the common accepted practice used for MDG indicators. Developing countries are those not listed as developed or transition countries. The list of least developed countries (LDCs) has been agreed by the General Assembly, on the recommendation of the Committee for Development Policy, Economic and Social Council.