Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) vs Uzbekistan: Gross receipts by developing countries of mobilised private finance

Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)
26.72
in 2024
Uzbekistan
553.07
in 2024
Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) rank
30th
Uzbekistan rank
27th

Gross receipts by developing countries of mobilised private finance over time

  • Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)
  • Uzbekistan
02505007501.0k1.2k201620202024

How they compare

Uzbekistan currently reports 553.07 against 26.72 in Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand), a difference of 526.35.

That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 20.7 times Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)'s.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) ahead.

Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) ranks 30th and Uzbekistan ranks 27th of 34 groups.

Across the 2 decades both report, Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) averaged higher in 1 and Uzbekistan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) Uzbekistan Difference Ahead
2010s 7.12 3.58 3.54 Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)
2020s 46.15 675.35 629.21 Uzbekistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross receipts by developing countries of mobilised private finance, Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) or Uzbekistan?
Uzbekistan, at 553.07 against 26.72 in Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) as of 2024.
What is the difference in gross receipts by developing countries of mobilised private finance between Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) and Uzbekistan?
526.35, with Uzbekistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) and Uzbekistan?
9 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2024.
How do Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) and Uzbekistan rank globally for gross receipts by developing countries of mobilised private finance?
Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) ranks 30th and Uzbekistan ranks 27th of 34 groups.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Gross receipts by developing countries of mobilised private finance (MPF) - on an experimental basis (millions of United States dollars). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) vs Uzbekistan: Gross receipts by developing countries of mobilised private finance. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/gross-receipts-by-developing-countries-of-mobilised-private-finance-mpf-on-an/oceania-exc-australia-and-new-zealand/uzbekistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/gross-receipts-by-developing-countries-of-mobilised-private-finance-mpf-on-an/oceania-exc-australia-and-new-zealand/uzbekistan/">Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) vs Uzbekistan: Gross receipts by developing countries of mobilised private finance</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross receipts by developing countries of mobilised private finance (MPF) - on an experimental basis (millions of United States dollars)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
169 places, 1,415 data points, 2016–2024
Last refreshed