Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs): Gross receipts by developing countries of official sustainable

Democratic Republic of the Congo
3,456
in 2024
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
27,880
in 2024
Democratic Republic of the Congo rank
6th
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) rank
3rd

Gross receipts by developing countries of official sustainable over time

  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
  • Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
010.0k20.0k30.0k201920212024

How they compare

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) currently reports 27,880 against 3,456 in Democratic Republic of the Congo, a difference of 24,424.

That makes Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 8.1 times Democratic Republic of the Congo's.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) has been ahead every year.

Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 6th and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ranks 3rd of 23 countries.

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of the Congo Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) Difference Ahead
2010s 2,878 23,316 20,438 Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
2020s 3,171 27,478 24,307 Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross receipts by developing countries of official sustainable, Democratic Republic of the Congo or Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)?
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs), at 27,880 against 3,456 in Democratic Republic of the Congo as of 2024.
What is the difference in gross receipts by developing countries of official sustainable between Democratic Republic of the Congo and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)?
24,424, with Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of the Congo and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)?
6 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2024.
How do Democratic Republic of the Congo and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) rank globally for gross receipts by developing countries of official sustainable?
Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 6th and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ranks 3rd of 23 countries.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Gross receipts by developing countries of official sustainable development grants (millions of United States dollars). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs): Gross receipts by developing countries of official sustainable. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/gross-receipts-by-developing-countries-of-official-sustainable-development-grants/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/landlocked-developing-countries-lldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/gross-receipts-by-developing-countries-of-official-sustainable-development-grants/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/landlocked-developing-countries-lldcs/">Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs): Gross receipts by developing countries of official sustainable</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross receipts by developing countries of official sustainable development grants (millions of United States dollars)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
184 places, 1,100 data points, 2019–2024
Last refreshed