Malawi vs United Republic of Tanzania: Gross receipts by developing countries of official sustainable
Malawi
1,467
in 2024
United Republic of Tanzania
1,486
in 2024
Malawi rank
24th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
23rd
Gross receipts by developing countries of official sustainable over time
- Malawi
- United Republic of Tanzania
How they compare
United Republic of Tanzania currently reports 1,486 against 1,467 in Malawi, a difference of 19.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2019 it was United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
Malawi ranks 24th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 23rd of 157 countries.
United Republic of Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | United Republic of Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1,098 | 1,460 | 362.35 | United Republic of Tanzania |
| 2020s | 1,262 | 1,569 | 307.66 | United Republic of Tanzania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross receipts by developing countries of official sustainable, Malawi or United Republic of Tanzania?
- United Republic of Tanzania, at 1,486 against 1,467 in Malawi as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gross receipts by developing countries of official sustainable between Malawi and United Republic of Tanzania?
- 19, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and United Republic of Tanzania?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2024.
- How do Malawi and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for gross receipts by developing countries of official sustainable?
- Malawi ranks 24th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 23rd of 157 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Gross receipts by developing countries of official sustainable development grants (millions of United States dollars). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.