Montserrat vs Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha: Gross receipts by developing countries of official sustainable

Montserrat
57
in 2024
Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha
53.68
in 2024
Montserrat rank
111th
Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha rank
113th

Gross receipts by developing countries of official sustainable over time

  • Montserrat
  • Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha
204060201920212024

How they compare

Montserrat currently reports 57 against 53.68 in Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha, a difference of 3.32.

That makes Montserrat's figure about 1.1 times Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2019 it was Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha ahead.

Montserrat ranks 111th and Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha ranks 113th of 130 countries.

Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Montserrat Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha Difference Ahead
2010s 35.99 53.6 17.61 Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha
2020s 39.39 48.91 9.53 Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross receipts by developing countries of official sustainable, Montserrat or Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha?
Montserrat, at 57 against 53.68 in Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha as of 2024.
What is the difference in gross receipts by developing countries of official sustainable between Montserrat and Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha?
3.32, with Montserrat ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Montserrat and Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha?
6 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2024.
How do Montserrat and Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha rank globally for gross receipts by developing countries of official sustainable?
Montserrat ranks 111th and Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha ranks 113th of 130 countries.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Gross receipts by developing countries of official sustainable development grants (millions of United States dollars). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Montserrat vs Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha: Gross receipts by developing countries of official sustainable. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/gross-receipts-by-developing-countries-of-official-sustainable-development-grants/montserrat/saint-helena/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/gross-receipts-by-developing-countries-of-official-sustainable-development-grants/montserrat/saint-helena/">Montserrat vs Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha: Gross receipts by developing countries of official sustainable</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross receipts by developing countries of official sustainable development grants (millions of United States dollars)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
184 places, 1,100 data points, 2019–2024
Last refreshed