Large Marine Ecosystem: Agulhas Current vs Large Marine Ecosystem: Baltic Sea: Indicator for Coastal Eutrophication Potential (ICEP) (kilograms of)

Large Marine Ecosystem: Agulhas Current
1.14
in 2015
Large Marine Ecosystem: Baltic Sea
0.7057
in 2015
Large Marine Ecosystem: Agulhas Current rank
25th
Large Marine Ecosystem: Baltic Sea rank
27th

Indicator for Coastal Eutrophication Potential (ICEP) (kilograms of) over time

  • Large Marine Ecosystem: Agulhas Current
  • Large Marine Ecosystem: Baltic Sea
-2-1012200020072015

How they compare

Large Marine Ecosystem: Agulhas Current currently reports 1.14 against 0.7057 in Large Marine Ecosystem: Baltic Sea, a difference of 0.4343.

That makes Large Marine Ecosystem: Agulhas Current's figure about 1.6 times Large Marine Ecosystem: Baltic Sea's.

Across all 16 years both countries report, Large Marine Ecosystem: Agulhas Current has been ahead every year.

Large Marine Ecosystem: Agulhas Current ranks 25th and Large Marine Ecosystem: Baltic Sea ranks 27th of 64 countries.

Large Marine Ecosystem: Agulhas Current has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Large Marine Ecosystem: Agulhas Current Large Marine Ecosystem: Baltic Sea Difference Ahead
2000s 1.55 -0.1399 1.69 Large Marine Ecosystem: Agulhas Current
2010s 1.17 0.1047 1.07 Large Marine Ecosystem: Agulhas Current

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher indicator for coastal eutrophication potential (icep) (kilograms of), Large Marine Ecosystem: Agulhas Current or Large Marine Ecosystem: Baltic Sea?
Large Marine Ecosystem: Agulhas Current, at 1.14 against 0.7057 in Large Marine Ecosystem: Baltic Sea as of 2015.
What is the difference in indicator for coastal eutrophication potential (icep) (kilograms of) between Large Marine Ecosystem: Agulhas Current and Large Marine Ecosystem: Baltic Sea?
0.4343, with Large Marine Ecosystem: Agulhas Current ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Large Marine Ecosystem: Agulhas Current and Large Marine Ecosystem: Baltic Sea?
16 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2015.
How do Large Marine Ecosystem: Agulhas Current and Large Marine Ecosystem: Baltic Sea rank globally for indicator for coastal eutrophication potential (icep) (kilograms of)?
Large Marine Ecosystem: Agulhas Current ranks 25th and Large Marine Ecosystem: Baltic Sea ranks 27th of 64 countries.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Indicator for Coastal Eutrophication Potential (ICEP) (kilograms of carbon from algae biomass per sq. km. of river basin area per day). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Large Marine Ecosystem: Agulhas Current vs Large Marine Ecosystem: Baltic Sea: Indicator for Coastal Eutrophication Potential (ICEP) (kilograms of). Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/indicator-for-coastal-eutrophication-potential-icep-kilograms-of-carbon-from-algae/large-marine-ecosystem-agulhas-current/large-marine-ecosystem-baltic-sea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/indicator-for-coastal-eutrophication-potential-icep-kilograms-of-carbon-from-algae/large-marine-ecosystem-agulhas-current/large-marine-ecosystem-baltic-sea/">Large Marine Ecosystem: Agulhas Current vs Large Marine Ecosystem: Baltic Sea: Indicator for Coastal Eutrophication Potential (ICEP) (kilograms of)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Indicator for Coastal Eutrophication Potential (ICEP) (kilograms of carbon from algae biomass per sq. km. of river basin area per day)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
66 places, 1,056 data points, 2000–2015
Last refreshed