Large Marine Ecosystem: Bay of Bengal vs Large Marine Ecosystem: Black Sea: Indicator for Coastal Eutrophication Potential (ICEP) (kilograms of)

Large Marine Ecosystem: Bay of Bengal
6.56
in 2015
Large Marine Ecosystem: Black Sea
3.81
in 2015
Large Marine Ecosystem: Bay of Bengal rank
14th
Large Marine Ecosystem: Black Sea rank
16th

Indicator for Coastal Eutrophication Potential (ICEP) (kilograms of) over time

  • Large Marine Ecosystem: Bay of Bengal
  • Large Marine Ecosystem: Black Sea
24681012200020072015

How they compare

Large Marine Ecosystem: Bay of Bengal currently reports 6.56 against 3.81 in Large Marine Ecosystem: Black Sea, a difference of 2.75.

That makes Large Marine Ecosystem: Bay of Bengal's figure about 1.7 times Large Marine Ecosystem: Black Sea's.

Across all 16 years both countries report, Large Marine Ecosystem: Bay of Bengal has been ahead every year.

Large Marine Ecosystem: Bay of Bengal ranks 14th and Large Marine Ecosystem: Black Sea ranks 16th of 64 countries.

Large Marine Ecosystem: Bay of Bengal has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Large Marine Ecosystem: Bay of Bengal Large Marine Ecosystem: Black Sea Difference Ahead
2000s 9.74 3.73 6.01 Large Marine Ecosystem: Bay of Bengal
2010s 8.24 3.03 5.22 Large Marine Ecosystem: Bay of Bengal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher indicator for coastal eutrophication potential (icep) (kilograms of), Large Marine Ecosystem: Bay of Bengal or Large Marine Ecosystem: Black Sea?
Large Marine Ecosystem: Bay of Bengal, at 6.56 against 3.81 in Large Marine Ecosystem: Black Sea as of 2015.
What is the difference in indicator for coastal eutrophication potential (icep) (kilograms of) between Large Marine Ecosystem: Bay of Bengal and Large Marine Ecosystem: Black Sea?
2.75, with Large Marine Ecosystem: Bay of Bengal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Large Marine Ecosystem: Bay of Bengal and Large Marine Ecosystem: Black Sea?
16 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2015.
How do Large Marine Ecosystem: Bay of Bengal and Large Marine Ecosystem: Black Sea rank globally for indicator for coastal eutrophication potential (icep) (kilograms of)?
Large Marine Ecosystem: Bay of Bengal ranks 14th and Large Marine Ecosystem: Black Sea ranks 16th of 64 countries.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Indicator for Coastal Eutrophication Potential (ICEP) (kilograms of carbon from algae biomass per sq. km. of river basin area per day). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Large Marine Ecosystem: Bay of Bengal vs Large Marine Ecosystem: Black Sea: Indicator for Coastal Eutrophication Potential (ICEP) (kilograms of). Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/indicator-for-coastal-eutrophication-potential-icep-kilograms-of-carbon-from-algae/large-marine-ecosystem-bay-of-bengal/large-marine-ecosystem-black-sea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/indicator-for-coastal-eutrophication-potential-icep-kilograms-of-carbon-from-algae/large-marine-ecosystem-bay-of-bengal/large-marine-ecosystem-black-sea/">Large Marine Ecosystem: Bay of Bengal vs Large Marine Ecosystem: Black Sea: Indicator for Coastal Eutrophication Potential (ICEP) (kilograms of)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Indicator for Coastal Eutrophication Potential (ICEP) (kilograms of carbon from algae biomass per sq. km. of river basin area per day)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
66 places, 1,056 data points, 2000–2015
Last refreshed