Large Marine Ecosystem: Beaufort Sea vs Large Marine Ecosystem: Gulf of California: Indicator for Coastal Eutrophication Potential (ICEP) (kilograms of)

Large Marine Ecosystem: Beaufort Sea
-1.61
in 2015
Large Marine Ecosystem: Gulf of California
-0.6192
in 2015
Large Marine Ecosystem: Beaufort Sea rank
42nd
Large Marine Ecosystem: Gulf of California rank
40th

Indicator for Coastal Eutrophication Potential (ICEP) (kilograms of) over time

  • Large Marine Ecosystem: Beaufort Sea
  • Large Marine Ecosystem: Gulf of California
-3-2-10200020072015

How they compare

Large Marine Ecosystem: Gulf of California currently reports -0.6192 against -1.61 in Large Marine Ecosystem: Beaufort Sea, a difference of 0.9908.

Across all 16 years both countries report, Large Marine Ecosystem: Gulf of California has been ahead every year.

Large Marine Ecosystem: Beaufort Sea ranks 42nd and Large Marine Ecosystem: Gulf of California ranks 40th of 64 countries.

Large Marine Ecosystem: Gulf of California has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Large Marine Ecosystem: Beaufort Sea Large Marine Ecosystem: Gulf of California Difference Ahead
2000s -1.46 -0.4385 1.02 Large Marine Ecosystem: Gulf of California
2010s -1.86 -0.4062 1.46 Large Marine Ecosystem: Gulf of California

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher indicator for coastal eutrophication potential (icep) (kilograms of), Large Marine Ecosystem: Beaufort Sea or Large Marine Ecosystem: Gulf of California?
Large Marine Ecosystem: Gulf of California, at -0.6192 against -1.61 in Large Marine Ecosystem: Beaufort Sea as of 2015.
What is the difference in indicator for coastal eutrophication potential (icep) (kilograms of) between Large Marine Ecosystem: Beaufort Sea and Large Marine Ecosystem: Gulf of California?
0.9908, with Large Marine Ecosystem: Gulf of California ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Large Marine Ecosystem: Beaufort Sea and Large Marine Ecosystem: Gulf of California?
16 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2015.
How do Large Marine Ecosystem: Beaufort Sea and Large Marine Ecosystem: Gulf of California rank globally for indicator for coastal eutrophication potential (icep) (kilograms of)?
Large Marine Ecosystem: Beaufort Sea ranks 42nd and Large Marine Ecosystem: Gulf of California ranks 40th of 64 countries.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Indicator for Coastal Eutrophication Potential (ICEP) (kilograms of carbon from algae biomass per sq. km. of river basin area per day). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Large Marine Ecosystem: Beaufort Sea vs Large Marine Ecosystem: Gulf of California: Indicator for Coastal Eutrophication Potential (ICEP) (kilograms of). Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/indicator-for-coastal-eutrophication-potential-icep-kilograms-of-carbon-from-algae/large-marine-ecosystem-beaufort-sea/large-marine-ecosystem-gulf-of-california/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/indicator-for-coastal-eutrophication-potential-icep-kilograms-of-carbon-from-algae/large-marine-ecosystem-beaufort-sea/large-marine-ecosystem-gulf-of-california/">Large Marine Ecosystem: Beaufort Sea vs Large Marine Ecosystem: Gulf of California: Indicator for Coastal Eutrophication Potential (ICEP) (kilograms of)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Indicator for Coastal Eutrophication Potential (ICEP) (kilograms of carbon from algae biomass per sq. km. of river basin area per day)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
66 places, 1,056 data points, 2000–2015
Last refreshed