Large Marine Ecosystem: California Current vs Large Marine Ecosystem: Sea of Okhotsk: Indicator for Coastal Eutrophication Potential (ICEP) (kilograms of)

Large Marine Ecosystem: California Current
-6.93
in 2015
Large Marine Ecosystem: Sea of Okhotsk
-10.13
in 2015
Large Marine Ecosystem: California Current rank
48th
Large Marine Ecosystem: Sea of Okhotsk rank
51st

Indicator for Coastal Eutrophication Potential (ICEP) (kilograms of) over time

  • Large Marine Ecosystem: California Current
  • Large Marine Ecosystem: Sea of Okhotsk
-10-8-6-4200020072015

How they compare

Large Marine Ecosystem: California Current currently reports -6.93 against -10.13 in Large Marine Ecosystem: Sea of Okhotsk, a difference of 3.2.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Large Marine Ecosystem: California Current ahead.

Large Marine Ecosystem: California Current ranks 48th and Large Marine Ecosystem: Sea of Okhotsk ranks 51st of 64 countries.

Large Marine Ecosystem: California Current has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Large Marine Ecosystem: California Current Large Marine Ecosystem: Sea of Okhotsk Difference Ahead
2000s -5.32 -7.68 2.36 Large Marine Ecosystem: California Current
2010s -6.65 -8.71 2.07 Large Marine Ecosystem: California Current

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher indicator for coastal eutrophication potential (icep) (kilograms of), Large Marine Ecosystem: California Current or Large Marine Ecosystem: Sea of Okhotsk?
Large Marine Ecosystem: California Current, at -6.93 against -10.13 in Large Marine Ecosystem: Sea of Okhotsk as of 2015.
What is the difference in indicator for coastal eutrophication potential (icep) (kilograms of) between Large Marine Ecosystem: California Current and Large Marine Ecosystem: Sea of Okhotsk?
3.2, with Large Marine Ecosystem: California Current ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Large Marine Ecosystem: California Current and Large Marine Ecosystem: Sea of Okhotsk?
16 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2015.
How do Large Marine Ecosystem: California Current and Large Marine Ecosystem: Sea of Okhotsk rank globally for indicator for coastal eutrophication potential (icep) (kilograms of)?
Large Marine Ecosystem: California Current ranks 48th and Large Marine Ecosystem: Sea of Okhotsk ranks 51st of 64 countries.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Indicator for Coastal Eutrophication Potential (ICEP) (kilograms of carbon from algae biomass per sq. km. of river basin area per day). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Large Marine Ecosystem: California Current vs Large Marine Ecosystem: Sea of Okhotsk: Indicator for Coastal Eutrophication Potential (ICEP) (kilograms of). Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/indicator-for-coastal-eutrophication-potential-icep-kilograms-of-carbon-from-algae/large-marine-ecosystem-california-current/large-marine-ecosystem-sea-of-okhotsk/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/indicator-for-coastal-eutrophication-potential-icep-kilograms-of-carbon-from-algae/large-marine-ecosystem-california-current/large-marine-ecosystem-sea-of-okhotsk/">Large Marine Ecosystem: California Current vs Large Marine Ecosystem: Sea of Okhotsk: Indicator for Coastal Eutrophication Potential (ICEP) (kilograms of)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Indicator for Coastal Eutrophication Potential (ICEP) (kilograms of carbon from algae biomass per sq. km. of river basin area per day)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
66 places, 1,056 data points, 2000–2015
Last refreshed