Large Marine Ecosystem: East China Sea vs Large Marine Ecosystem: North Sea: Indicator for Coastal Eutrophication Potential (ICEP) (kilograms of)
Large Marine Ecosystem: East China Sea
6.67
in 2015
Large Marine Ecosystem: North Sea
4.52
in 2015
Large Marine Ecosystem: East China Sea rank
13th
Large Marine Ecosystem: North Sea rank
15th
Indicator for Coastal Eutrophication Potential (ICEP) (kilograms of) over time
- Large Marine Ecosystem: East China Sea
- Large Marine Ecosystem: North Sea
How they compare
Large Marine Ecosystem: East China Sea currently reports 6.67 against 4.52 in Large Marine Ecosystem: North Sea, a difference of 2.15.
That makes Large Marine Ecosystem: East China Sea's figure about 1.5 times Large Marine Ecosystem: North Sea's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Large Marine Ecosystem: North Sea ahead.
Large Marine Ecosystem: East China Sea ranks 13th and Large Marine Ecosystem: North Sea ranks 15th of 64 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Large Marine Ecosystem: East China Sea averaged higher in 1 and Large Marine Ecosystem: North Sea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Large Marine Ecosystem: East China Sea | Large Marine Ecosystem: North Sea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 6.86 | 9.77 | 2.91 | Large Marine Ecosystem: North Sea |
| 2010s | 6.89 | 4.77 | 2.11 | Large Marine Ecosystem: East China Sea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher indicator for coastal eutrophication potential (icep) (kilograms of), Large Marine Ecosystem: East China Sea or Large Marine Ecosystem: North Sea?
- Large Marine Ecosystem: East China Sea, at 6.67 against 4.52 in Large Marine Ecosystem: North Sea as of 2015.
- What is the difference in indicator for coastal eutrophication potential (icep) (kilograms of) between Large Marine Ecosystem: East China Sea and Large Marine Ecosystem: North Sea?
- 2.15, with Large Marine Ecosystem: East China Sea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Large Marine Ecosystem: East China Sea and Large Marine Ecosystem: North Sea?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2015.
- How do Large Marine Ecosystem: East China Sea and Large Marine Ecosystem: North Sea rank globally for indicator for coastal eutrophication potential (icep) (kilograms of)?
- Large Marine Ecosystem: East China Sea ranks 13th and Large Marine Ecosystem: North Sea ranks 15th of 64 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Indicator for Coastal Eutrophication Potential (ICEP) (kilograms of carbon from algae biomass per sq. km. of river basin area per day). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.