Large Marine Ecosystem: East China Sea vs Large Marine Ecosystem: Southeast U.S. Continental Shelf: Indicator for Coastal Eutrophication Potential (ICEP) (kilograms of)
Large Marine Ecosystem: East China Sea
6.67
in 2015
Large Marine Ecosystem: Southeast U.S. Continental Shelf
7.06
in 2015
Large Marine Ecosystem: East China Sea rank
13th
Large Marine Ecosystem: Southeast U.S. Continental Shelf rank
12th
Indicator for Coastal Eutrophication Potential (ICEP) (kilograms of) over time
- Large Marine Ecosystem: East China Sea
- Large Marine Ecosystem: Southeast U.S. Continental Shelf
How they compare
Large Marine Ecosystem: Southeast U.S. Continental Shelf currently reports 7.06 against 6.67 in Large Marine Ecosystem: East China Sea, a difference of 0.39.
That makes Large Marine Ecosystem: Southeast U.S. Continental Shelf's figure about 1.1 times Large Marine Ecosystem: East China Sea's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Large Marine Ecosystem: Southeast U.S. Continental Shelf ahead.
Large Marine Ecosystem: East China Sea ranks 13th and Large Marine Ecosystem: Southeast U.S. Continental Shelf ranks 12th of 64 countries.
Large Marine Ecosystem: Southeast U.S. Continental Shelf has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Large Marine Ecosystem: East China Sea | Large Marine Ecosystem: Southeast U.S. Continental Shelf | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 6.86 | 7.29 | 0.4341 | Large Marine Ecosystem: Southeast U.S. Continental Shelf |
| 2010s | 6.89 | 6.96 | 0.0729 | Large Marine Ecosystem: Southeast U.S. Continental Shelf |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher indicator for coastal eutrophication potential (icep) (kilograms of), Large Marine Ecosystem: East China Sea or Large Marine Ecosystem: Southeast U.S. Continental Shelf?
- Large Marine Ecosystem: Southeast U.S. Continental Shelf, at 7.06 against 6.67 in Large Marine Ecosystem: East China Sea as of 2015.
- What is the difference in indicator for coastal eutrophication potential (icep) (kilograms of) between Large Marine Ecosystem: East China Sea and Large Marine Ecosystem: Southeast U.S. Continental Shelf?
- 0.39, with Large Marine Ecosystem: Southeast U.S. Continental Shelf ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Large Marine Ecosystem: East China Sea and Large Marine Ecosystem: Southeast U.S. Continental Shelf?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2015.
- How do Large Marine Ecosystem: East China Sea and Large Marine Ecosystem: Southeast U.S. Continental Shelf rank globally for indicator for coastal eutrophication potential (icep) (kilograms of)?
- Large Marine Ecosystem: East China Sea ranks 13th and Large Marine Ecosystem: Southeast U.S. Continental Shelf ranks 12th of 64 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Indicator for Coastal Eutrophication Potential (ICEP) (kilograms of carbon from algae biomass per sq. km. of river basin area per day). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.